Uber Drivers Forum banner
  • If you have joined UberPeople.net because your Uber account was hacked, you've likely been taken in by a scam. Please read this before starting a thread on this subject.

UberXL cheaper than Uber X! This should need never be!

1 reading
6.5K views 21 replies 17 participants last post by  uberboise  
#1 ·
I understand the literal answer to this question, so no one needs to explain the details of how rates are calculated, supply and demand, etc...

The way I'm looking at this is, and XL vehicle in general, costs more to buy, more to own, and more to fuel. It seems to me that even if demand for XL is very low, that the price for a given ride should never be lower for XL than it is for X. Point being a regardless of the fair the customer pays, it always costs more for a driver to get them there and and XL car than an X car...

Am I out of line in my thinking here? Or do you agree with me?
 
#6 ·
If you drive XL, aren't you also required to take X rides?

If you go into the riders app, and put in a specific destination, there are many times where it's cheaper for the rider to take the ride through Uber XL than it is to take the ride through Uber X. In my opinion, Uber xl should never be cheaper for the rider than Uber X. I'm wondering if other people agree?
 
#12 ·
With all of the taxes and fees in the Capital of Your Nation, and, with Uber's Upfront Pricing Scam that bases your upfront quote on what you have been willing to pay in the past, the cab is now less expensive than UberX, or, about the same, on short and mediocre trips. Even if you add the two dollars service charge for Uber Taxi, Uber Taxi is less expensive than, or, about the same as, UberX for these trips. More people here are discovering this and are either hailing cabs or picking Uber Taxi, as that option is available, here.

This applies to base rate trips, mind you.

If there is even a mild surge, where Uber is charging the customer a multiplier but giving the driver nothing, UberX quickly becomes more expensive than a cab.
 
#15 ·
The point I'm trying to make (and failing miserably at), it's that I believe that the pricing algorithm should be changed so that the price of XL is never lower than the price of X. In other words, even if X is surging, once a ride on X rises to match the price of XL, then XL would go up with the price of X. The price of XL could be equal to X but, never less than X (irregardless of surges).
 
#18 ·
Who cares? Base prices I'm getting are fixed. I always make more on an XL than an X. Why do I care if a PAX is paying more for an X than an XL. More demand on XL means I'm making more money.

As mentioned, on Uber you can select what to drive. On Lyft, you can not. But you can decline the ping if it's not an XL.
 
#16 ·
I totally agree that it should never be cheeper. I actually have not paid enough attention to it to know if that happens here, haven't seen it happen but they are good at hiding that type of thing.

That would explain the single passenger ordering xl during a surge though. Don't have this often but it has happened. I don't count it as that when it is a 300 lb+ or 6'2"+ person, figure they are wanting the leg room.
 
#21 ·
If you drive XL, aren't you also required to take X rides?

If you go into the riders app, and put in a specific destination, there are many times where it's cheaper for the rider to take the ride through Uber XL than it is to take the ride through Uber X. In my opinion, Uber xl should never be cheaper for the rider than Uber X. I'm wondering if other people agree?
Majority of the pax gaming the system quite wisely. Even though they may in need of xl or select ride, they will still send request for x. If they didn't get their perfect vehicle, cancel, repeat and send another request. I am sure you are aware of it. It shouldn't be allowed by guber in the first place. Thank God for the black car and suv drivers for going on strike to force guber to repeal their cruelty (not stupidity). Otherwise pax may get to the airport from downtown in just $25 (in 3x more expensive vehicle) instead of $100.