Unfair Uber takes away 63% of my fare
Zdriver19
we are not entitled to that money.... it is not our money all that we are entitled to is the agreed to rate per mile and per min. I don't know where people get that something is theirs when it is not.
Of "your" fare?
No, you got your cut to what you agreed to. You are paid your BASE FARE + 75% of the MILEAGE + 75% of the TIME. The other charges Uber makes the pax pay is their's, which is not our's, nor did we agree to any portion of that money. They take 25% of the Mileage and Time, plus 100% of their booking fees.
No, you got your cut to what you agreed to. You are paid your BASE FARE + 75% of the MILEAGE + 75% of the TIME. The other charges Uber makes the pax pay is their's, which is not our's, nor did we agree to any portion of that money. They take 25% of the Mileage and Time, plus 100% of their booking fees.
Next time take the longest route available and drive as slow as possible. For now that's the only thing you can do in order to increase your cut.
Look at your pay the proof is there. We agreed to get a set rate per mile and per minute. What the passenger pays has no relation to what you are paid. Hell I have many trips where the passenger pays less than I get paid.
Yeah. This isn't anything new.
If u agree to drive for $1/mi $.17/min or whatever the rates currently are you'll get paid that. No more. No less.
Thanks for playing.
If u agree to drive for $1/mi $.17/min or whatever the rates currently are you'll get paid that. No more. No less.
Thanks for playing.
The posters who criticize topics such as this one as being "old news", or "what else is new", or "this topic has been posted a zillion times" don't seem to realize or maybe don't care that this website gets new visitors 24/7.
Some of the new visitors know little to nothing about what's going on in the rideshare business, and thus aren't gonna look up the topic of uber's outrageous cuts in the search engine. And that's assuming the visitor know how to use a search engine, and that the search engine works properly (which they sometimes don't). Some people are too lazy or whatever to use search engines.
Also, there's a tendency with lots of people (including some of the critics) to only scan the first page of topics on a website like this.
Some visitors may be from the media or govt, such as the recent poster who works for the DC govt.
If frequently repeating important topics such as this helps get the message out to the govt and public, then the redundancy is well worth it.
And for those who are annoyed by those threads, simply don't read them.
Check out other threads on this topic and you'll see plenty of annoyed responses about it being old news.
Some of the new visitors know little to nothing about what's going on in the rideshare business, and thus aren't gonna look up the topic of uber's outrageous cuts in the search engine. And that's assuming the visitor know how to use a search engine, and that the search engine works properly (which they sometimes don't). Some people are too lazy or whatever to use search engines.
Also, there's a tendency with lots of people (including some of the critics) to only scan the first page of topics on a website like this.
Some visitors may be from the media or govt, such as the recent poster who works for the DC govt.
If frequently repeating important topics such as this helps get the message out to the govt and public, then the redundancy is well worth it.
And for those who are annoyed by those threads, simply don't read them.
Yeah, you missed one of the previous posters who said there's nothing new with this topic.
Check out other threads on this topic and you'll see plenty of annoyed responses about it being old news.
Uber doesn't look at it that way at all. They see it was you costing them 37% of the money they are taking in, and they'd like to reduce this overhead even more.
You know u can make out all the info u tried to write over lol ..... yea this Uber people suck
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
