The destination filters on Lyft and Uber can be a driver's best friend. They are excellent tools first thing in the morning to help get you into the earning zone in the city from your home in the deep suburbs, or to get you back home at the end of the day. But Lyft's destination filter is inferior to Uber's in important ways.
Fix #1: In Lyft, you cannot remove the destination filter while in route with a passenger. I typically set the destination filter to SFO from my home far away. When I've scored a passenger going to SFO, I would like to immediately remove the destination filter so that I can get my next ride as I'm approaching the dropoff point in the terminal. Because Uber allows this, I'm much more likely to start driving with Uber in the morning, using their destination filter rather than Lyft. As soon as an SFO-bound passenger is in the car, I immediately remove the destination filter on Uber so that I might score an airport ride request as I'm dropping off the last passenger.
Fix #2: Lyft is casting far too wide a net when the driver is in destination filter mode. Before the Bay Bridge approaches jam up at 2pm each workday, I typically park myself near a Bay Bridge entrance. I set a destination filter back home to Concord which is about 40 miles away. Most of the requests I get from Lyft would have me return a couple blocks toward downtown, and then drive someone six blocks laterally toward Mission Bay, taking me further from the bridge entrances. I've learned to call every single Lyft passenger while in destination mode to ask where they are going, and then cancel rides that are not crossing the bridge. This wastes the time of passengers, most of whom incidentally don't want to inconvenience a driver, and it wastes the time of drivers who learn to feel that Lyft does not respect their time and their wishes very well.
Uber's destination filter works much better for matching riders' actual destinations with the wishes of drivers. They will even match passengers with drivers who are a smidge further away than the nearest driver. Thus I tend to use Uber's destinatation filter to get home, depriving Lyft of a driver. But if Lyft really wants to keep such a wide net, there are possible solutions that seem obvious:
1) Don't send ride requests that are less than a chunk of miles, say 20%, of a driver's destination; or
2) Tell the driver how many miles the passenger will be going toward her destination, right up front when sending the request; or
3) Allow the driver to specify in the destination filter how many minimum miles she is willing to take a passenger toward her destination.
Any of these solutions would lead to happy, less inconvenienced, less annoyed passengers (and drivers too).
Fix #3: Fix the online doc, inform Lyft support staff of changes, and otherwise improve cross-team communication. Four weeks ago, Lyft allowed six destination filters each day. Suddenly they changed to three-only without bothering to tell anyone, including their drivers, support staff, and documentation team. I learned this the hard way while trying to get home one day. The support staff was clueless about any change, and referred me back to the doc which still read SIX. About a week later they got around to changing their doc to 3 destination filters per day. The funny thing is that this about the same time Uber increased their destination filters per day from two to six. Apparently in a competitive panic, a team with the power at Lyft set the variable back to SIX but again didn't bother to tell anyone!! It took Lyft two more weeks to correct their online documentation which now (as of today!) reads six again. This is not a good look for the company's cross-team culture.
Fix #1: In Lyft, you cannot remove the destination filter while in route with a passenger. I typically set the destination filter to SFO from my home far away. When I've scored a passenger going to SFO, I would like to immediately remove the destination filter so that I can get my next ride as I'm approaching the dropoff point in the terminal. Because Uber allows this, I'm much more likely to start driving with Uber in the morning, using their destination filter rather than Lyft. As soon as an SFO-bound passenger is in the car, I immediately remove the destination filter on Uber so that I might score an airport ride request as I'm dropping off the last passenger.
Fix #2: Lyft is casting far too wide a net when the driver is in destination filter mode. Before the Bay Bridge approaches jam up at 2pm each workday, I typically park myself near a Bay Bridge entrance. I set a destination filter back home to Concord which is about 40 miles away. Most of the requests I get from Lyft would have me return a couple blocks toward downtown, and then drive someone six blocks laterally toward Mission Bay, taking me further from the bridge entrances. I've learned to call every single Lyft passenger while in destination mode to ask where they are going, and then cancel rides that are not crossing the bridge. This wastes the time of passengers, most of whom incidentally don't want to inconvenience a driver, and it wastes the time of drivers who learn to feel that Lyft does not respect their time and their wishes very well.
Uber's destination filter works much better for matching riders' actual destinations with the wishes of drivers. They will even match passengers with drivers who are a smidge further away than the nearest driver. Thus I tend to use Uber's destinatation filter to get home, depriving Lyft of a driver. But if Lyft really wants to keep such a wide net, there are possible solutions that seem obvious:
1) Don't send ride requests that are less than a chunk of miles, say 20%, of a driver's destination; or
2) Tell the driver how many miles the passenger will be going toward her destination, right up front when sending the request; or
3) Allow the driver to specify in the destination filter how many minimum miles she is willing to take a passenger toward her destination.
Any of these solutions would lead to happy, less inconvenienced, less annoyed passengers (and drivers too).
Fix #3: Fix the online doc, inform Lyft support staff of changes, and otherwise improve cross-team communication. Four weeks ago, Lyft allowed six destination filters each day. Suddenly they changed to three-only without bothering to tell anyone, including their drivers, support staff, and documentation team. I learned this the hard way while trying to get home one day. The support staff was clueless about any change, and referred me back to the doc which still read SIX. About a week later they got around to changing their doc to 3 destination filters per day. The funny thing is that this about the same time Uber increased their destination filters per day from two to six. Apparently in a competitive panic, a team with the power at Lyft set the variable back to SIX but again didn't bother to tell anyone!! It took Lyft two more weeks to correct their online documentation which now (as of today!) reads six again. This is not a good look for the company's cross-team culture.