Uber Drivers Forum banner
1 - 8 of 39 Posts
But why exclusively Uber or Lyft? We are all humans, and there is no psychological evaluation done on a taxi, bus, limo, airport shuttle driver either? Any and all human beings are capable of such treachery...
Taxi, bus, limo airport shuttle drivers are vetted. They have face to face interviews, previous employer checks, driving tests and SUPERVISION. Huge difference!
 
That does not change the fact that anyone is capable of anything lol. Cops are some of the most heavily screened and they have issues sometimes correct?
Of course anyone is capable of anything. And unscreened and unmonitored employees are MORE capable and more at risk. Thus more scrutiny.
 
irrelevant. the guy that was killed wasn't even killed by the uber driver. the point is, ANY driver can kill you. it doesn't matter if you're in the car with a vetted, interviewed, professional. if another driver wants to ram you drunkenly from behind at 120, you might die!

sure, screening drivers better would be a good thing. but think about it practically- this is a major impediment for ubers business model so they would do the absolute bare minimum to satisfy whatever vetting regulations were placed on them. maybe they'd 'catch' a few crazies before they got activated but it's not like there will ever be a driving competence test. uber drivers would still make the news, humans after all, and people would still whine that uber should 'do more'. there is nothing to do. putting a human in a mobile 4000lb metal box comes with unavoidable dangers.

the uber serial killer would have passed any interview/background check you gave him. more than just a DL/background check is just useless red tape to placate the masses.
So your argument is that hiring good drivers doesn't fit Uber's business model. Sounds like a flawed business model doesn't it?
 
Thats definitely not what he said. Last I checked a taxi or limo driver can get a medallion or TCP set up for themselves if they have the money...who screens them?

I could go get a TCP set up and have a limo and not interview or screen myself to drive people correct?
It's definitely what he said...
"screening drivers better would be a good thing. but think about it practically- this is a major impediment for ubers business model"

Screening for better drivers is an impediment for the Uber business model, thus a flawed business model.

To get a TCP permit, you must be able to qualify for commercial insurance, which is a much higher standard than personal insurance. You also must enroll in a drug testing program and enroll in the DMV pull notice system. While the standards are not as high as I would like, they are much higher than you describe. Furthermore, to get an LAX permit, you must get approval from the City Of Los Angeles attorneys office. Not to mention this process is expensive, complicated and takes at least 6 months. The process would eliminate most people who would not take the job seriously.
 
you twisted my words there. regardless, i'm definitely not denying that uber is a poorly managed business. their model has set them up for very high driver turnover. uber is understood to be a pretty shit gig now, basically minimum wage. they lose thousands of drivers a day. therefore they need to gain even more drivers than they lose to further expand. any kind of roadblock or speedbump in contention with fasttracking drivers on the road would be a major problem for uber, they will avoid this at all costs.

there will have to be serious legislation passed for uber to do more than they do in regard to activating drivers. and even if uber was mandated to do everything you can dream of, there would still be uber drivers in accidents, doing dumb stuff, running people over, etc. worry about yourself I say
I understand your point and agree with you up until the last sentence. I even agree that serious legislation is needed and people will do dumb stuff. However, most of the dumb stuff can be reduced by proper vetting, proper training and supervision. I'm not saying eliminated, but dramatically reduced.
 
Yeah, people think Uber can step up their background checks and do psychological pre hire interviews and that will still prevent people from using their free will in the future to pull a crazy stunt, smh.

still doesn't prevent what I quoted from SurgeMachine
Nobody thinks proper vetting will prevent crazy stunts, but it most certainly would reduce them.
 
1 - 8 of 39 Posts