Uber Drivers Forum banner
  • If you have joined UberPeople.net because your Uber account was hacked, you've likely been taken in by a scam. Please read this before starting a thread on this subject.
1 - 20 of 26 Posts

Mars Troll Number 4

· Registered
Joined
·
7,046 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
So i took out a taxi last night, one of my fares was at a fairly busy barsteraunt, I was looking for "Bob party 2"
(Bar Loui Sand lake RD X turkey Lake RD)

A lady walks up and asks for a ride.

"What's your name mam, or the name of the caller, i'm here for a phone-dispatched pickup"

"Tamara"

"i'm sorry, i'm looking for someone else"

"You here for bob?" A white guy asks me.

"Yes Bob, I'm Tokahara I'll be your driver" I tell him as I open the door for him and his wife.

An hour later I here from the dispatch manager that I " refused a customer because she was black"

Stupid ($(*$*%*#&$&%&*%*&% $(%*%**%* %(%**%**(^)$*@*%(@%*

"Yeah i was on a dispatch call and she wasn't my customer" i explain to the night dispatch manager.

"$(*$* %((%" the night manager replies to me.

"yup" i reply.
 
So i took out a taxi last night, one of my fares was at a fairly busy barsteraunt, I was looking for "Bob party 2"
(Bar Loui Sand lake RD X turkey Lake RD)

A lady walks up and asks for a ride.

"What's your name mam, or the name of the caller, i'm here for a phone-dispatched pickup"

"Tamara"

"i'm sorry, i'm looking for someone else"

"You here for bob?" A white guy asks me.

"Yes Bob, I'm Tokahara I'll be your driver" I tell him as I open the door for him and his wife.

An hour later I here from the dispatch manager that I " refused a customer because she was black"

Stupid ($(*$*%*#&$&%&*%*&% $(%*%**%* %(%**%**(^)$*@*%(@%*

"Yeah i was on a dispatch call and she wasn't my customer" i explain to the night dispatch manager.

"$(*$* %((%" the night manager replies to me.

"yup" i reply.
For better or worse...

There seems to be a gaggle of people...

That have not learned...

How to take NO for an answer....8>O

Now...while I respect the raw power...

That can be brought to bear...

By false inuendo and lies...

My thinking...we need to teach...

People how to take NO for an answer...

And not have a stroke about it...8>)

Am I the only monkey seeing this...?

Rakos
Image
 
A lady walks up and asks for a ride.
"What's your name mam, or the name of the caller, i'm here for a phone-dispatched pickup"
"Tamara"
"i'm sorry, i'm looking for someone else"
"You here for bob?" A white guy asks me.
"Yes Bob, I'm Tokahara I'll be your driver" I tell him as I open the door for him and his wife.
An hour later I here from the dispatch manager that I " refused a customer because she was black"
As both an official of what was then the premier radio cab company in the Capital of Your Nation, as well as a driver for the same, I do not know how many times I have had to deal with complaints like that. Back then, we had real dispatch. The operators wrote the calls on slips of paper. What we had to do was send a copy of the call slip as well as a cover letter with the driver to the Hack Office. That would get him out of trouble. Race almost always was involved.

It happened to me, personally, once or twice. I always had the call on the trip sheet, as well. The law does require you to note on your trip sheet what time you went ON CALL and the address to which you were proceeding. The trip sheet, alone, usually did not exonerate you, as, for the most part, the adjudicators believed your trip sheet only when they could use it against you.

I did have a case, once, though, where it involved a previous arrangement rather than a dispatched call. Fortunately, this was a regular customer of mine, so she provided a letter for me. As I suspected that this, alone, would not be enough, I gathered old trip sheets where I had picked up this customer. She always paid with a credit card. My copy of the credit car receiptwas always stapled to the trip sheet for the day. In fact, I make income and expense notations on my trip sheets every day, list running totals and have receipts and copies stapled to each one. The handwriting is barely legible on the trips*. All of the above makes the trip sheets look real and demonstrates that I pay my taxes. The Hack Office let me go.

We had another case at American University, oddly enough, at Christmas time getaway. It appears that this young lady (and I use the term loosely), was trying to get a ride to one of the less popular destination neighbourhoods. Of course, the drivers who were ON CALL refused her, as they were supposed to pick up the passenger assigned by the dispatcher. She was, of course, one of these "militant", "assertive", "aware", "conscious", "advocay" types, so she wrote down every cab number and time of refusal, called the Chairman of the Taxicab Commission and made her complaint.

The Chairman called me, demanded to know what was going on; demanded to know why my drivers would not take her and finally demanded that I produce these drivers in his office in less than an hour. I told him that less than an hour was not happening, but that I would have them there either late that afternoon, if they had not gone home, or the next day. He threatened, pissed and moaned, but he agreed. I actually made it happen that afternoon. In addition, I got the call slips for every driver involved for the hour before and after the alleged occurrences.

The Chair gave all of us a lecture. When it was my turn to speak, I let him have it and told him that I was tired of some people hollering "DISCRIMINATION!!!!!" when anything happened that did not quite sit right with them. I added that what made me even more unhappy was that people actually listened to them, when it was obvious that something else could have been the case. That Chair knew damned well that my company was mostly a dispatch company, that we got a large volume of business from American University and that it was get away time there. I then handed him all of the call slips for all of the drivers and told him that if he looked at them he would see that every driver was ON CALL. We got into a shouting match over it. In fact, he started hurling insults at me about New Yorkers (I am really from Massachusetts, originally, but my mother's side of the family is from New York and I did live there as a child and a young man) and how we had big mouths and no respect. Of course, I had to return the favour about people from New Jersey (he was from Newark and was the head Cab Regulator, there). Finally, we calmed down, and I told him to say what he would, and, if he wanted to push it, he already knew the name and telephone number of the Company Lawyer. He let the drivers go, but he did have to add another lecture. In reality, the Chair and I had a good working relationship, but we did go at each other from time to time, even on record.

* I have been to more than one hearing where the adjudicators informed a driver that they would not accept his trip sheet because it looked manufactured "on a kitchen table, last night", They cited that it was neat, everything lined up and it was too easy to read. They mentioned that in a real situation, it would be held in an awkward position and the information would have been hastily scribbled. My trip sheets are barely legible, except for the income/expense portions on it that I add at the end of every work day. Some people in the Hack Office have commented on that, but I told them that while my handwriting is more like hieroglyphics, even under the best of conditions (I averaged D s in penmanship--If I actually got a C in penmanship in any quarter, my parents considered it cause for celebration), I do add the expense income while I am sitting at the kitchen table at the end of every day. We still use handwritten trip sheets up here. They are due to go out, soon, though. At that point, I will keep a notebook with dates, trip times, fare charged, tips, opening and closing mileage. This will be simply for the benefit of the Internal Revenue, should it ask questions. As The District of Columbia loves to overregulate those who can or will not pay to keep away the regulation, the Regulators have gone as far as to prohibit the use of paper trip sheets when the new rule takes effect. Let them try to issue me a summons for that. They have no control over how I keep my records, as long as I keep them accurately.
 
Discussion starter · #6 ·
The difference is..

We record everything (and archive a lot). We have been using a computer dispatch system since 1986! (this is not a typo, I am really saying we have been using computer dispatch for 31 years) {in case anyone is curious the computers used a radio modem and the company still has 3 radio towers}

So i don't actually know how it was to do radio based

The phone call ordering me was recorded,
and my computer showed me driving empty to the bar,
and initiating a text message to the customer who phoned in the call on arrival.

This is on top of my paper trip sheet log (pickup loc, passenger count, destination, price paid, and CC or cash)

All this tech does CYA very well.

I guarantee that woman won't bother calling the VFH unit on me, and even if she does i'll never hear another word about it.

Just trying to scam the company into a free ride if you ask me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tohunt4me and Rakos
The difference is..

We record everything (and archive a lot). We have been using a computer dispatch system since 1986! (this is not a typo, I am really saying we have been using computer dispatch for 31 years) {in case anyone is curious the computers used a radio modem and the company still has 3 radio towers}

So i don't actually know how it was to do radio based.
I do not expect that it is a typographical error. The first computer call assignment in this area was in a suburb in 1983. The suburbs were all computer based call assignment here by the early 1990s. The City was last. Much of it was because we did not think that computer based call assignment would work on a Zone System for fare calculation. We had no meters until 2008. The first company in the City that went to a computer based call assignment was in 1999. The drivers hated it. In fact, that company lost drivers to us and to the third and fourth radio companies. Still, they persisted. At one point, the fourth radio company was swallowed by the third. He had computer-assist, but it was still real dispatch, not call-assignment. A human being still took bids (locations) and put out the calls. In 2012, the third company got its computer based call assignment. He kept his dispatchers. I was on the microphone when the system went live for the first time and put the first call over that system manually, when it was still in the test phase. We were working it in a combination of voice/electronic for some time, until everyone's cab got its console. In 2013, the last company got its computer based call assignment. I worked the last voice shift on that company. This means that I was the last voice dispatcher who actually dispatched in the Capital of Your Nation.

The companies did keep their dispatchers, so I did continue to work until an operator messed up something and the ownership blamed it on me. They cut my schedule to two shifts that I did not want, so I quit. That made them happier, as they replaced me with a minimum wage worker. The drivers hate that, but what can they do? All of the other companies finally got rid of their highly (relatively) paid dispatchers and went to minimum wage workers.

There are systems here that track the drivers and know what is on the console, so, if there is any question, you can bring up the information. In fact, the companies must submit that date to the Hack Office.

When I finally do hit Powerball or Mega Millions, I am going to be giving quite a bit of work to some high powered lawyer when I sue the Department of For Hire Vehicles for all of its violations of the law and My Rights.
 
Anyone of any race can call for a cab and not be discriminated against
I was the official of my company who handled the suit brought against it by some do-gooders who manufactured a "problem" then proceeded to complain about it. The do-gooders asserted that the opposite of what I quoted above was the case with my company. We were pushed into a rigged game, as I learned later. The judge was biased and there were even ex parte communications between officials of the court and the plaintiffs. The whole thing came to naught, though, when the plaintiffs saw in black, red and white what I had been telling them from the beginning: the company's balance sheet was worse than that of a Colorado short line in the 1930s. Supposedly when they got hold of our balance sheet and books (all that you have to do, these days, is run into a court and holler "DISCRIMINATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" , and you get to find out everything about the party whom you are suing while he gets to find out little, if anything about you. In addition, thanks to the Doctrine of "Burden Shifting" (ENGLISH TRANSLATION: the accused is deprived of rights guaranteed to him or it under the Constitution of the United States of America), the plaintiff does not even have to prove his case. Marry, you must prove that the plaintiff has no case. THAT is a travesty. THAT is a hallmark of a repressive dictatorship.), they almost fainted. They could not believe that anything could stay in business with so horrid a balance sheet. I had to point out to them that the aforementioned Colorado railroads DID manage to stay in business, for a while, at least.

....but, oh no, there are people (like "Reverend" Al Warepdtongue), who will insist that the opposite is true.

To be sure, as Mears Troll Number 4 indicates, and, as I indicated in a previous post, what the quoted poster states is the case. In the case that Mears Troll Number 4 describes as well as several that I described, the drivers denied service because the people who approached them, initially, were not the people that these drivers had been assigned to fetch. Even the Taxicab Regulations in all jurisdictions make allowances for taxicabs that are ON CALL. You do have to display signs that indicate that the cab is ON CALL. Unfortunately, few people, if any, actually read those signs. It is similar to the Uber driver's putting a NO SMOKING or NO EATING sign in his car. Most of his customers will ignore it.
 
Discussion starter · #10 ·
I was the official of my company who handled the suit brought against it by some do-gooders who manufactured a "problem" then proceeded to complain about it. The do-gooders asserted that the opposite of what I quoted above was the case with my company. We were pushed into a rigged game, as I learned later. The judge was biased and there were even ex parte communications between officials of the court and the plaintiffs. The whole thing came to naught, though, when the plaintiffs saw in black, red and white what I had been telling them from the beginning: the company's balance sheet was worse than that of a Colorado short line in the 1930s. Supposedly when they got hold of our balance sheet and books (all that you have to do, these days, is run into a court and holler "DISCRIMINATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" , and you get to find out everything about the party whom you are suing while he gets to find out little, if anything about you. In addition, thanks to the Doctrine of "Burden Shifting" (ENGLISH TRANSLATION: the accused is deprived of rights guaranteed to him or it under the Constitution of the United States of America), the plaintiff does not even have to prove his case. Marry, you must prove that the plaintiff has no case. THAT is a travesty. THAT is a hallmark of a repressive dictatorship.), they almost fainted. They could not believe that anything could stay in business with so horrid a balance sheet. I had to point out to them that the aforementioned Colorado railroads DID manage to stay in business, for a while, at least.

....but, oh no, there are people (like "Reverend" Al Warepdtongue), who will insist that the opposite is true.

To be sure, as Mears Troll Number 4 indicates, and, as I indicated in a previous post, what the quoted poster states is the case. In the case that Mears Troll Number 4 describes as well as several that I described, the drivers denied service because the people who approached them, initially, were not the people that these drivers had been assigned to fetch. Even the Taxicab Regulations in all jurisdictions make allowances for taxicabs that are ON CALL. You do have to display signs that indicate that the cab is ON CALL. Unfortunately, few people, if any, actually read those signs. It is similar to the Uber driver's putting a NO SMOKING or NO EATING sign in his car. Most of his customers will ignore it.
Another difference between Orlando and (where are you at?) is that I am protected under an umbrella by a company who is under the protection of, one of the largest and most powerful corporations in america, and an employer who directly employs over 60,000 people in the greater Orlando area.

As long as they don't have justification to sell me out, the courts will bend to their will.

They bought the law, I pay my tax to the rat kingdom and i play ball. At it's very heart it's a disagreement between me and one passenger, VS someone who was trying to steal another customer's taxi.

As long as my position is defend-able, they WILL have my back. The rules are pretty easy to follow...

I am in the service to a corporation that is at it's heart, Lawful evil. But that's OK, because in a lawful evil corporation if you follow the rules the money flows in the proper direction. Away from the customer and uphill. This is something that uber has been completely unable to figure out.

Lawful Evil is order and most importantly prosperity, while lacking freedom. I know how to play ball, so i don't get burned.The rules are there for everyone's protection, not mine, not the customer, not our corporate overlords, everyone. As long as I toe the line and do what i'm told I will have a place in the Rat Kingdom.

I may not be able to wear what i want to wear, or choose the car i wish to use. I have to pay out of pocket to rent a vehicle. I know some of the money i give goes uphill to give the Rat Kingdom their kickback. But that's OK, because sometimes kickbacks are worth paying out.

The rules that the Rat Kingdom laid out are harsh, and controlling. But it has led to prosperity, Far better than the path of destruction that the Chaotic evil Uber has carved across this great nation, leaving nothing but victims and a entitled paxholes.

The victim of a business transaction should be the customer, not the employee workforce.
 

Attachments

I was the official of my company who handled the suit brought against it by some do-gooders who manufactured a "problem" then proceeded to complain about it. The do-gooders asserted that the opposite of what I quoted above was the case with my company. We were pushed into a rigged game, as I learned later. The judge was biased and there were even ex parte communications between officials of the court and the plaintiffs. The whole thing came to naught, though, when the plaintiffs saw in black, red and white what I had been telling them from the beginning: the company's balance sheet was worse than that of a Colorado short line in the 1930s. Supposedly when they got hold of our balance sheet and books (all that you have to do, these days, is run into a court and holler "DISCRIMINATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" , and you get to find out everything about the party whom you are suing while he gets to find out little, if anything about you. In addition, thanks to the Doctrine of "Burden Shifting" (ENGLISH TRANSLATION: the accused is deprived of rights guaranteed to him or it under the Constitution of the United States of America), the plaintiff does not even have to prove his case. Marry, you must prove that the plaintiff has no case. THAT is a travesty. THAT is a hallmark of a repressive dictatorship.), they almost fainted. They could not believe that anything could stay in business with so horrid a balance sheet. I had to point out to them that the aforementioned Colorado railroads DID manage to stay in business, for a while, at least.

....but, oh no, there are people (like "Reverend" Al Warepdtongue), who will insist that the opposite is true.

To be sure, as Mears Troll Number 4 indicates, and, as I indicated in a previous post, what the quoted poster states is the case. In the case that Mears Troll Number 4 describes as well as several that I described, the drivers denied service because the people who approached them, initially, were not the people that these drivers had been assigned to fetch. Even the Taxicab Regulations in all jurisdictions make allowances for taxicabs that are ON CALL. You do have to display signs that indicate that the cab is ON CALL. Unfortunately, few people, if any, actually read those signs. It is similar to the Uber driver's putting a NO SMOKING or NO EATING sign in his car. Most of his customers will ignore it.
NYC cabs whizzing past blacks to pick up whites isn't exactly a new thing.
 
Discussion starter · #12 ·
NYC cabs whizzing past blacks to pick up whites isn't exactly a new thing.
Yeah but if i tell a white guy i'm at a particular spot to pickup someone who phoned in a taxi. They don't call me racist... (which they could i guess...

If i have a good reason not to take someone, they shouldn't pull the race card. I'm not white either. I'm a ****** eyed Asian guy...

And I HAVE been discriminated against in this world, it sucks...

But i've also walked into a restaurant that didn't have any tables looked around and knew that if i was a white guy it wouldn't help.

And if a taxi driver told me he couldn't take me because he was on a fare already i'd be cool with it.

Because it's not like Asians have any better rep for being tippers as certain other demographics...

and it's not always about race, Because if stereotypes were true...

I wouldn't ever be able to finish a shift without doing this...
Being Asian = Bad driver is a stereotype i have to deal with every stinkin day.

Image


I also know what it's like to have taxi drivers go right past,

For the record it seems to happen more in my civies and less in american sports team stuff but very rarely in US army uniform, It was unheard of.

So i'll let you figure that one out...
 
  • Like
Reactions: tohunt4me
NYC cabs whizzing past blacks to pick up whites isn't exactly a new thing.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \ / \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/
Yeah but if i tell a white guy i'm at a particular spot to pickup someone who phoned in a taxi. They don't call me racist... (which they could i guess... If i have a good reason not to take someone, they shouldn't pull the race card. I'.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

There are far too many people out there, and "Reverend" Al Warpedtongue is one of the best known, for whom the definition of "discrimination" is "anything that does not sit quite right with me or that does not go my way".

(where are you at?)
The Capital of Your Nation
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \ / \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

There are far too many people out there, and "Reverend" Al Warpedtongue is one of the best known, for whom the definition of "discrimination" is "anything that does not sit quite right with me or that does not go my way".

The Capital of Your Nation
You're confusing discrimination with assumed preference. You'd likely be better served listening to Rev. AL's experiences with discrimination as opposed to ridiculing something so obviously foreign to you.
 
You're confusing discrimination with assumed preference.

You'd likely be better served listening to Rev. AL's experiences with discrimination as opposed to ridiculing something so obviously foreign to you.
Both of us will be better served if you try to make whatever point it is in the first sentence by expressing said point more clearly.

As for the second, ain't no discrimination what ain't necessarily furrin' t'me. I am white, but that does not mean that people do not discriminate against me. I have been discriminated against for the way that I look. I will pass over the details, for now. Instead, let me go to this characteristic for which people have discriminated against me. This is a characteristic over which I have no control. I might be able to change something to avoid it, but why should I and why should I be ashamed of it? I have a French surname. I lived in Canada. When I lived there, the "blokes" treated the French Canadians like garbage. As I had a French surname, it was assumed that I was one. I am U.S. born and my French heritage does not come from Québec, or anywhere else in Canada, but the "blokes" served me just as poorly as they did any French Canadian. Yes, I can speak French, but, of course, the blokes assumed that this meant that I could not speak English, or speak it very well. More than one of them got a nasty surprise. So no, discrimination is not foreign to me.
 
Both of us will be better served if you try to make whatever point it is in the first sentence by expressing said point more clearly.

As for the second, ain't no discrimination what ain't necessarily furrin' t'me. I am white, but that does not mean that people do not discriminate against me. I have been discriminated against for the way that I look. I will pass over the details, for now. Instead, let me go to this characteristic for which people have discriminated against me. This is a characteristic over which I have no control. I might be able to change something to avoid it, but why should I and why should I be ashamed of it? I have a French surname. I lived in Canada. When I lived there, the "blokes" treated the French Canadians like garbage. As I had a French surname, it was assumed that I was one. I am U.S. born and my French heritage does not come from Québec, or anywhere else in Canada, but the "blokes" served me just as poorly as they did any French Canadian. Yes, I can speak French, but, of course, the blokes assumed that this meant that I could not speak English, or speak it very well. More than one of them got a nasty surprise. So no, discrimination is not foreign to me.
The point was crystal clear. And if you want to liken said French Canadian experiences to the discrimination Rev. Al discusses on his weekly TV show than have at it.
 
I will NEVER reject a pax because of race. I WILL reject a pax every time because it's not the one I've been dispatched to pick up. It's illegal for me to do otherwise.

If the pax I got as a pickup is black, green, or purple, I will pick them up. And if somebody starts acting racist in my car, they're going to end up on the side of the road waiting for somebody else.

I was a kid in the '70s. My parents had their high school bombed because of racism. I don't tolerate it well, one of my good friends in high school was the daughter of someone who had to endure that s**t, My father fought over who got to slash the out of town racist scumbag's tires.

If Uber is prioritizing pax based on race, I'll never drive for Uber again. I don't believe that's happening, I firmly believe Uber is basing it entirely on first-come, first served. But if that's not the case, I need to know.
 
I WILL reject a pax every time because it's not the one I've been dispatched to pick up.

It's illegal for me to do otherwise.
(emphasis added)

Numero Uno on TNC, of you pick up someone other than the customer that the application assigns you, y'ain't a-gonna' get no pay fer no trip like that. If I am on Uber Taxi, that day, at least I can get paid if I pick up someone other than whom the application assigns. Both I and my vehicle are licenced, insured and equipped to do that..............

....................................................which brings me to the emphasised parts of the above quote: if you do take someone other than whom the application assigned, it becomes a street hail. I am not familiar with the rules and laws in Tennessee, but all three states (yes, I know, the District of Columbia ain't no state, but work with me on this one) here state specifically that TNC drivers can not accept street hails. I suspect that the same is the case in Tennessee, as one of the things that Scruber and Gryft use to circumvent taxi regulations everywhere is that you can not hail one of their vehicles on the street. In fact, both TNCs will de-activate, no questions asked, if one of their drivers accepts a street hail.

In addition, as a TNC driver, y'ain't got none uh that thar' right kinda' insurance to pick up no street hail. If you haul a customer other than the one that the application assigned, and, there is a collision with injuries, Uber's carrier will not pay. Yours will not, either, as it does not cover any occurrence while you are driving for compensation. In addition, every motor vehicle liability policy that I ever have seen contains an exclusion for illegal activity. Accepting a street hail is illegal. Odds are, in addition to refusing to pay, your carrier will drop you. Thus, it IS important that the TNC driver take care to transport ONLY the customer that the application has assigned to him.

As I do drive both, I do have to remember that on days when I leave the cab at home and drive the Uber/Lyft car, I must not take street hails. There have been times when I have seen a hand go up and I have started for the kerb, only to remember that I am driving the Uber/Lyft car to-day.
 
Discussion starter · #20 ·
The point was crystal clear. And if you want to liken said French Canadian experiences to the discrimination Rev. Al discusses on his weekly TV show than have at it.
What kind of minorities do you think there are in Canadia?

I'll give you a hint, the red-headed step child of Canadia is French Canadians.

Virtually every Canadian is white but the group discriminated against the worst are the francophones (that and jews).

The french Canadians were even targeted by the KKK (when it existed in Canadia) just like it targeted Jews and immigrants.

(emphasis added)

Numero Uno on TNC, of you pick up someone other than the customer that the application assigns you, y'ain't a-gonna' get no pay fer no trip like that. If I am on Uber Taxi, that day, at least I can get paid if I pick up someone other than whom the application assigns. Both I and my vehicle are licenced, insured and equipped to do that..............

....................................................which brings me to the emphasised parts of the above quote: if you do take someone other than whom the application assigned, it becomes a street hail. I am not familiar with the rules and laws in Tennessee, but all three states (yes, I know, the District of Columbia ain't no state, but work with me on this one) here state specifically that TNC drivers can not accept street hails. I suspect that the same is the case in Tennessee, as one of the things that Scruber and Gryft use to circumvent taxi regulations eeverywhere is that you can not hail one of their vehicles on the street. In fact, both TNCs will de-activate, no questions asked, if one of their drivers accepts a street hail.

As I do drive both, I do have to remember that on days when I leave the cab at home and driver the Uber/Lyft car, I must not take street hails. There have been times when I have seen a hand go up and I have started for the kerb, only to remember that I am driving the Uber/Lyft car to-day.
Unless you have driven a taxi, you just don't understand what me and Another Uber Driver are are talking about I guess.

When taxis are on calls, we are operating like an uber driver is. We have to find the person we are looking for. PERIOD!

Then while we are IDLE we can take a flag down or a street hail, or a drop and load (There's someone who wants a ride at the exact place you're dropping off at)

The problem is that the public expects us to be in flag down mode when we are actually looking for a specific person. This is when this whole mess starts.

Also I disagree... with one point Another Uber Driver made.

DC is a state, well it's not but it has a lot of powers of one.
 
1 - 20 of 26 Posts