Joined
·
2,375 Posts
This is the dumbest article I've read all year. None of his arguments are valid.
Exactly. It's pure nonsense. The author has no knowledge on this subject.This is the dumbest article I've read all year. None of his arguments are valid.
Do you understand how everything you say or show here is corporate bull shit?This is the dumbest article I've read all year. None of his arguments are valid.
Flying Cars coming soon !Do you understand how everything you say or show here is corporate bull shit?
People won't own sdc's because they won't like them. Otherwise, I've seen you express the idea of GM being a reliable partner. What do you know about GM's corporate crime and shenanigans? They only partner with Lyft because Lyft gives them a platform to test in real life environment, but if GM wants to develop their own platform who is there to stop them ?Exactly. It's pure nonsense. The author has no knowledge on this subject.
1) People don't need to buy these, they will be TNCs.
2) Hacking can be said about any technology and would be far harder with a SDC.
3) No infrastructure changes are needed.
Etc.
Don't hate the Tomato, he's just the messenger.Do you understand how everything you say or show here is corporate bull shit?
They won't own them cause they won't need to own them. GM doesn't need Lyft to test in real life. They are already doing that via Cruise which they bought last year.People won't own sdc's because they won't like them. Otherwise, I've seen you express the idea of GM being a reliable partner. What do you know about GM's corporate crime and shenanigans? They only partner with Lyft because Lyft gives them a platform to test in real life environment, but if GM wants to develop their own platform who is there to stop them ?
Homework, Sparky. Do it.People won't own sdc's because they won't like them. Otherwise, I've seen you express the idea of GM being a reliable partner. What do you know about GM's corporate crime and shenanigans? They only partner with Lyft because Lyft gives them a platform to test in real life environment, but if GM wants to develop their own platform who is there to stop them ?
Where do you find these idiot writers? And why aren't you willing to educate yourself so you can tell when they're full of crap? Self driving cars have an onboard 3D map. They don't need lines. Some people go through life blaming others for why they're so unhappy. Self driving cars are amazing yet, all you can do is whine. Sad. Very sad.https://www.recode.net/2017/9/5/16257314/stop-autonomous-self-driving-cars-not-coming-soon-future
This is the beginning of the end. Here is where this technology is going - San Francisco is considering legislation that would ban sidewalk delivery robots - https://www.recode.net/2017/5/16/15...tion-ban-autonomous-delivery-robots-sidewalks
"Don't hate the Tomato, he's just the messenger."
I know you are mesmerized by corporate speech, but they are lying to you kid. That's what corporations do. Do you need any examples for the car manufacturers lies?
How about your loving Google? - Google spends millions on academic research to influence opinion, says watchdog - https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...-millions-academic-research-influence-opinion
Testing would take decades.
And the flaws in the software? Is hilarious - Laying a trap for self-driving cars - https://www.google.com/amp/s/techcrunch.com/2017/03/17/laying-a-trap-for-self-driving-cars/amp/
You know what's funny? The people hyping up for this technology will be the same to reject it and forget it after they will understand its limitations.Where do you find these idiot writers? And why aren't you willing to educate yourself so you can tell when they're full of crap? Self driving cars have an onboard 3D map. They don't need lines. Some people go through life blaming others for why they're so unhappy. Self driving cars are amazing yet, all you can do is whine. Sad. Very sad.
I'm beginning to think Uber drivers are not the best and the brightestYou know what's funny? The people hyping up for this technology will be the same to reject it and forget it after they will understand its limitations.
I know it hurts to realize how your beloved corporations like Google, Tesla or Apple are lying to you. But that is exactly what they are doing in order to sell their products. They don't fight for progress. Their only objective is maximum profit, not progress or saving lives. If progress will stay in their way to make profit, they will fight against progress.
Self driving cars don't need lines on the road? Who told you to keep repeating this corporate bull shit? Do you really believe this crap that is thrown at you by the corporations to maintain the hype and somehow justify their useless investment in self drivable cars? In a real life environment those sensors won't be able to distinguish were the road is anymore (rainy dark night). Without the lines, they will simply process the dark mud on the side of the road as the same as the asphalt.
Unlike most of you here, I had the chance to talk to self driveble Google cas engineers, and ask them questions. It is stupid to call the software an AI. There is NOTHING remotely close to an AI. The software needs to be as simple as possible, because a learning machine artificial intelligence it will start making conflicting decisions like a human, and you don't want that to happen. Why do you thing Waymo is quiet about the Google project? Because they are about to release the cars on the road, or because they realized there are way to many variables to work with and it become virtually impossible to handle the challenge ?
You are only educated by the corporate propagabda that will make you bite the worm like a "smart" fish you are, and end up on their plates to be consumed.
Cars will be owned by TNC's? And without a driver, who will punch the numbers at the entrance of a gated community for the car to go and pick up the riders? Who will help an old lady with her heavy luggage if she is home alone and wants to go to the airport? Who it will help you, if you have your leg in a cast, to get inside the car?
You say the interiors won't be trashed because monitoring systems inside the cars? Do you know why all the security cameras anywhere are OUT of reach? Because people will cover them with tape or bubble gum in order to do the damage. Without a driver, people will behave inside the self drveble cars like they behave in a movie theater. Do you know how the movie theater looks like after the movie? Well, because of that, every single car will need to be checked after every single ride, so you need to build a whole new infrastructure to check and clean those health hazards you think you'll like in the future.
Kid, you have no clue!
Hahahaha.... Yeah.... With this attitude I am not going to be a "well known member"... Are you 5? hahahahaI'm beginning to think Uber drivers are not the best and the brightest
Nothing. If they want to start at zero market share and screw over a company they invested $500M in, they could.People won't own sdc's because they won't like them. Otherwise, I've seen you express the idea of GM being a reliable partner. What do you know about GM's corporate crime and shenanigans? They only partner with Lyft because Lyft gives them a platform to test in real life environment, but if GM wants to develop their own platform who is there to stop them ?
Who will help an old lady with her heavy luggage if she is home alone and wants to go to the airport? Who it will help you, if you have your leg in a cast, to get inside the car?
Just so much nonsense. These have been covered many times and it's all silliness.You know what's funny? The people hyping up for this technology will be the same to reject it and forget it after they will understand its limitations.
I know it hurts to realize how your beloved corporations like Google, Tesla or Apple are lying to you. But that is exactly what they are doing in order to sell their products. They don't fight for progress. Their only objective is maximum profit, not progress or saving lives. If progress will stay in their way to make profit, they will fight against progress.
Self driving cars don't need lines on the road? Who told you to keep repeating this corporate bull shit? Do you really believe this crap that is thrown at you by the corporations to maintain the hype and somehow justify their useless investment in self drivable cars? In a real life environment those sensors won't be able to distinguish were the road is anymore (rainy dark night). Without the lines, they will simply process the dark mud on the side of the road as the same as the asphalt.
Unlike most of you here, I had the chance to talk to self driveble Google cas engineers, and ask them questions. It is stupid to call the software an AI. There is NOTHING remotely close to an AI. The software needs to be as simple as possible, because a learning machine artificial intelligence it will start making conflicting decisions like a human, and you don't want that to happen. Why do you think Waymo is quiet about the Google project? Because they are about to release the cars on the road, or because they realized there are way to many variables to work with and it become virtually impossible to handle the challenge ?
You are only educated by the corporate propaganda that will make you bite the worm like a "smart" fish you are, and end up on their plates to be consumed.
Cars will be owned by TNC's? And without a driver, who will punch the numbers at the entrance of a gated community for the car to go and pick up the riders? Who will help an old lady with her heavy luggage if she is home alone and wants to go to the airport? Who it will help you, if you have your leg in a cast, to get inside the car?
You say the interiors won't be trashed because monitoring systems inside the cars? Do you know why all the security cameras anywhere are OUT of reach? Because people will cover them with tape or bubble gum in order to do the damage. Without a driver, people will behave inside the self drveble cars like they behave in a movie theater. Do you know how the movie theater looks like after the movie? Well, because of that, every single car will need to be checked after every single ride, so you need to build a whole new infrastructure to check and clean those health hazards you think you'll like in the future.
Kid, you have no clue!
o.o i totally forgot their was an autonomous section to this forum. Anyways all these points are valid and you have to be ignorant of hiw technology really works to not see that.
How much of MIT research do you find in a final corporate product? Hint - what MIT does it is out of corporate focus because MIT doesn't care about corporations profits. I can tell you about MIT graphene research and discoveries but still the implementation is over 3 decades away.Just so much nonsense. These have been covered many times and it's all silliness.
But here we go again:
SDCs don't need lines on the road. They use internal 3D maps and landmarks. MIT (not a corporation) says they can place the car within a centemeter with their ground penatrating radar even with a snow covered road. Oh, and they have found a way to build these GPRs for a few hundred dollars.
If you need assistance you call a car with an attendant in it. Amazing how easy that was to solve.
You cover the camera you get detected in a trillionth of a second and charged fees. Simple. If you make a mess you get charged a fee. Simple.
You have no clue what I am talking about!o.o i totally forgot their was an autonomous section to this forum. Anyways all these points are valid and you have to be ignorant of hiw technology really works to not see that.