Uber Drivers Forum banner
41 - 60 of 213 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
6,557 Posts
Uber's Pittsburgh fleet, which will be supervised by humans in the driver's seat for the time being,
This is really all you need to focus on. They will always be paired with humans. So basically they paid for all of this technology but you will still be paying the driver his rate. Until you remove the driver, which, as I've said many times now, will always be the case, they are basically throwing away money.

Right now, they got below market equilibrium rates combined with money losing/revenue reducing UberPool, while throwing money away at this Utopian driverless car theory, throwing away money offering free rides. And the investors never wonder what happened to the $16 billion dollars Travis has managed to blow through in Uber's 7 year history.

Great job, Travis
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,868 Posts
I just love that uber is nickel and diming the drivers with less and less money while throwing billions at this endeavor. Get rid of over a million drivers? I see an uprising akin to what would happen if the government tried to take away our guns. Black masked ex uber drivers sabotaging the driverless cars world wide. You will never catch me taking a ride in a driverless car, there are far too many variables that require human reasoning to safely navigate through busy city traffic.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
75,117 Posts
I just love that uber is nickel and diming the drivers with less and less money while throwing billions at this endeavor. Get rid of over a million drivers? I see an uprising akin to what would happen if the government tried to take away our guns. Black masked ex uber drivers sabotaging the driverless cars world wide. You will never catch me taking a ride in a driverless car, there are far too many variables that require human reasoning to safely navigate through busy city traffic.
They are using VOLVO S.U.V.'S.

Excellent choice for black market parts !
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,868 Posts
I'm curious, what happens to the dmv and insurance companies if people no longer drive. If a human is not driving who bears the responsibility when the machine malfunctions and crashes? Loss of billions in revenue will see the insurance companies fighting this tooth and nail. The dmv will lose too...no need to license people anymore.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
75,117 Posts
I'm curious, what happens to the dmv and insurance companies if people no longer drive. If a human is not driving who bears the responsibility when the machine malfunctions and crashes? Loss of billions in revenue will see the insurance companies fighting this tooth and nail. The dmv will lose too...no need to license people anymore.
Whoever the vehicle is registered to is responsible.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,772 Posts
This is really all you need to focus on. They will always be paired with humans. So basically they paid for all of this technology but you will still be paying the driver his rate. Until you remove the driver, which, as I've said many times now, will always be the case, they are basically throwing away money.

Right now, they got below market equilibrium rates combined with money losing/revenue reducing UberPool, while throwing money away at this Utopian driverless car theory, throwing away money offering free rides. And the investors never wonder what happened to the $16 billion dollars Travis has managed to blow through in Uber's 7 year history.

Great job, Travis
Not exactly money-throwing.

First mover in a technology will quickly acquire so many patents and processes that, the revenue stream coming from others implementing them might suppress your wildest imagination. Google, after all, was just a search algorithm when it started. Look how far they took it and how many new businesses they got into.

For example , Microsoft makes more money from each android phone than google which owns the android operating system.
 
41 - 60 of 213 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top