Doesn't matter how good you do when the pax is rating low because they don't like the surge price.
So a 2 * because they thought you were awesome but the trip cost "too much" means they're "right"?The star system isn't really broken? Could it be better? Yes! However, if you know how to get good ratings and consistently get 5's on average, you have nothing to worry about. Does that mean you have to strive for perfection, well yes. It means also that you know what to say to the Pax, how to treat them. Don't make wrong terms, don't argue. As the saying goes, the customer is always right. Thoughts?
A 2 here and there ain't gonna break the bank if you are consistently highly producing 5's. I think the odds of getting 100 2's in a row is a lot less likely than getting 100 5's in a row with stellar service.Doesn't matter how good you do when the pax is rating low because they don't like the surge price.
It's all subjective anyway. There is not a system that is objective unless they put cameras in your car and rate you themselves (even that is still subjective). Who wants big brother watching your every move at all times?So a 2 * because they thought you were awesome but the trip cost "too much" means they're "right"?
When you only go online when it's surging, you will end up with a lower rating than a driver who works when it's not surging. It's simple math.A 2 here and there ain't gonna break the bank if you are consistently highly producing 5's. I think the odds of getting 100 2's in a row is a lot less likely than getting 100 5's in a row with stellar service.
So, armed with that knowledge, you might want to be a little more strategic.When you only go online when it's surging, you will end up with a lower rating than a driver who works when it's not surging. It's simple math.
At $1.10 per mile up here in Columbus, I take non-surge requests for that exact reason. Anyone who can't maintain a 4.6 rating driving for non-surge probably shouldn't be behind the wheel.So, armed with that knowledge, you might want to be a little more strategic.
You mean work when you don't want to and lose money in order to not be deactivated so that you can work when you want to and make some (not much) money?So, armed with that knowledge, you might want to be a little more strategic.
They own a car. It's nice and clean and has 283 miles on it.If the customer is always right, then why am I the one who owns a car?
Funny thing is I only worked Saturday last week 5 hours. ONLY surges. When pax asked how I liked uber I told them it was great fun and I liked meeting awesome folks like them but the pay was shit unless it was surging. They would say but it's surging now. I told them yeah so now they're screwing you. The rest of the time they're screwing us.No, it isn't broken. Its purpose is not to ensure passengers get the highest quality drivers, as it is presented publicly. It's purpose is a lot more devious than that. Rest assured, it is doing exactly what Uber wants, and will therefore not be changed. Our mistake as drivers is believing it should be fair. It's not and won't be in its current state. It was never designed or intended for that. No, it's not broken -- it's just horribly flawed as a means of rating our performance. But it's perfect for whatever uses Uber has designed it for. Rest assured.
And the only consolation is that it does affect ALL drivers the same way. We ALL get the low stars for all the same reasons, so as long as it affects us all, it really has no effect on us. There are NO five-star drivers (except those just starting out, and what does that tell you), it's statistically impossible.
if you had 400 5's and 100 2's your rating would be 4.40 stars or the way i like to look at it, A 5 star rating 88%.A 2 here and there ain't gonna break the bank if you are consistently highly producing 5's. I think the odds of getting 100 2's in a row is a lot less likely than getting 100 5's in a row with stellar service.
If they deactivate you what will the letter say we will not let you run you car into the ground no moreSooner or later the rating system will be eliminated or will have no direct effects on drivers.
A class action law suit will force Uber to change it
If you get 100 2's, something has got to be wrong.if you had 400 5's and 100 2's your rating would be 4.40 stars or the way i like to look at it, A 5 star rating 88%.