Joined
·
1,039 Posts
Look what I got today:
LOL - Yeah Lyft is the victim here.
Good I will be taking cabs or limos.
Lyft/Uber certainly wasn't complaining that you needed an expensive medallion to operate a cab in Boston. They certainly were not complaining when a cab has to pay a pick up fee and Uber/Lyft did not. They certainly weren't complaining about cab drivers needing fingerprints.
Exactly what I have been saying from the pax point of view.^ You're missing the larger point; this will effect drivers on both platforms. Every rider I've talked to hates the central parking proposal. They're not gonna be happy about paying more for something they don't like.
That's happening at other airports and is probably coming to Logan at one point.How would any of you feel about rideshares lining up and taking whatever person jumped in first?
Hey. That $5 monthly donation I give to the "Greater Good Taxi Foundation" for bribes and influence has to be good for something.That's happening at other airports and is probably coming to Logan at one point.
Massport is being short sighted with this. Whether you, or they, like it or not rideshare is growing and fast becoming the preferred choice by the traveling public. The days of taxis taking the best real estate in the city and and the airport are numbered.
Instead of half ass solutions that anyone with a brain knows isn't going to work well they should swallow their pride, turn down the kick backs from the taxi interest groups and find a solution that works for everyone involved.
Penalizing pax by requiring them to pay more and be treated like second class citizens in the process is government at it's best. Shamefull.
lol. We are talking about $1.75 increase. What's the big deal?That's happening at other airports and is probably coming to Logan at one point.
Massport is being short sighted with this. Whether you, or they, like it or not rideshare is growing and fast becoming the preferred choice by the traveling public. The days of taxis taking the best real estate in the city and and the airport are numbered.
Instead of half ass solutions that anyone with a brain knows isn't going to work well they should swallow their pride, turn down the kick backs from the taxi interest groups and find a solution that works for everyone involved.
Penalizing pax by requiring them to pay more and be treated like second class citizens in the process is government at it's best. Shamefull.
A 50% increase in fees stacked on top of making people schlep to/from central parking?lol. We are talking about $1.75 increase. What's the big deal?
Well time to pay up, maybe the fee was set too low from the beginning.A 50% increase in fees stacked on top of making people schlep to/from central parking?
It's also stupid to charge rideshare pax more and have people walk while taxis sit at the curb and their customers would pay would pay less.
Logic would dictate the premium fee paid to Massport would be for the convenience of just grabbing a car at the curb.
There is also a proposed $5 drop off fee.lol. We are talking about $1.75 increase. What's the big deal?
I am not so sure they will even realize there is an increase in fee. Most don't even realize they are paying a fee now. Will this effect the amount of riders? I doubt it. People will still need rides from the airport. They still take uber and Lyft when there is a surge. Surge certainly doesn't stop them. Will this drive them cabs and livery services which will still be charging more? I doubt it. My guess this is all a set up for the introduction of line and pool at the airport.^ You're missing the larger point; this will effect drivers on both platforms. Every rider I've talked to hates the central parking proposal. They're not gonna be happy about paying more for something they don't like.
Agreed that most don't know they pay a fee now but that is starting to change since the articles about all the changes are hitting the news more. They do notice the increased pricing though. More of them are starting to shop the apps for lower pricing and there have been some pretty big swings. Add in the inconveinence of central parking and increase pricing and some absolutely will go back to livery services.I am not so sure they will even realize there is an increase in fee. Most don't even realize they are paying a fee now. Will this effect the amount of riders? I doubt it. People will still need rides from the airport. They still take uber and Lyft when there is a surge. Surge certainly doesn't stop them. Will this drive them cabs and livery services which will still be charging more? I doubt it. My guess this is all a set up for the introduction of line and pool at the airport.
Truth.Mass Port has no idea what they are doing. This proposal is a Taxi owners hit job on Logan ridesharing.
Yeah, typical little uber bro drama queen that is lyft. We only care about our pinky war chest.Agreed that most don't know they pay a fee now but that is starting to change since the articles about all the changes are hitting the news more. They do notice the increased pricing though. More of them are starting to shop the apps for lower pricing and there have been some pretty big swings. Add in the inconveinence of central parking and increase pricing and some absolutely will go back to livery services.
I'd also say that this email from Lyft has more to do with them losing the ability to gouge passengers as much with the fees paid to Massport increasing. More to Massport limits what they can take from the pax; they don't really care about the drivers and are using some scare tactics here. There is some merit to it affecting our pay at some point though.
Truth.
They can't make you take any ride. The only way they can get around this is if we have to sign another addendum stating that if we opt in for airport rides, if we drop off we have to wait to pick up. But once again, even if you opted in to the airport, who are they to tell you when you want to stop working. They can't. You could drop off and then just turn off app and leave. Granted they could turn your app off for a set period of time if you leave without a fare and have opted in, but I don't see any of those scenarios happening.So the new proposal is if I drop off at the airport I can't just leave I have to pick up someone else?