Uber Drivers Forum banner

1 - 20 of 57 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
357 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hydroxychloroquine has been used to treat coronavirus for decades but was arbitrarily deemed ineffective for use against Covid-19 and it was on the basis of no current approved treatment that "ALL" current COVID-19 Vaccines were granted EAU (Emergency Use Authorization) - This was necessary to administer them without conducting animal and human trials first to show they are safe. The FDA has yet to grant any of them official approval as being safe to use and even though manufacturers are doing everything they can to force and bribe the legalization of that goldmine right now, real experts in the field don't expect it before 2023 - otherwise its a huge gamble and there are already massive doubts based on reactions and deaths pilling up already.

If you want to take an experimental treatment thats up to you as a free American, but you should know that Hydroxychloroquine exists, has been used for decades and it's not being used right now probably because no company can patent it and make money off it since its produced all over the world for pennies.

599699


 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,447 Posts
🤦‍♂️

Vaccine is about prevention.

hydroxychloroquine even if it works to some degree (and that's setting aside if it even works), it's only about treatment.

Would you prefer cancer prevention or cancer treatment?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,537 Posts
🤦‍♂️

Vaccine is about prevention.
hydroxychloroquine even if it works to some degree (and that's setting aside if it even works), it's only about treatment. Would you prefer cancer prevention or cancer treatment?
Before there was a vaccine, there was hydroxychloroquine. Plenty studies have proven it effective for treating covid, and even anti-Trumper failed-presidential candidate Senator Klobuchar had to eat her own words and admit that hydroxychloroquine saved her husband’s life.
Furthermore, no vaccine is 100% guaranteed, and if you become infected, you’ll still want every treatment available.
Fact is, hydroxychloroquine only became an “issue” because the fake news media reporters (none of who were doctors or medical professionals I might add) couldn’t finish a sentence without trying to discredit Trump about everything. How sad for the lame-stream media that they get everything wrong; spy-gate, Russia-gate, Hunter-gate, lab-gate, etc.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
5,186 Posts
🤦‍♂️

Vaccine is about prevention.

hydroxychloroquine even if it works to some degree (and that's setting aside if it even works), it's only about treatment.

Would you prefer cancer prevention or cancer treatment?
Great! let us know when they have an FDA approved vaccine...
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
93 Posts
🤦‍♂️

Vaccine is about prevention.

hydroxychloroquine even if it works to some degree (and that's setting aside if it even works), it's only about treatment.

Would you prefer cancer prevention or cancer treatment?
Total bullshit. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin were being used last year on early symptoms to great effect until the lying shills for Big Pharma smeared them. Just like the labs as the source of the virus turned out to be true, so now is the effectiveness of these very affordable, very effective, very safe and well established early symptoms drugs.
The people who lied about the virus’s origins and the propagandists against Hydroxychloroquine have hundreds of thousands of unnecessary US deaths on their hands and they ought to be dragged before a Nuremberg-style court to explain their complicity with the Communist Chinese Party. And then they should face the Nuremberg punishment.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,335 Posts
599974


Also effective treatment, but not as good as a condom.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
93 Posts
Great! let us know when they have an FDA approved vaccine...
That’s right. Hydroxychloroquine worked and that’s why it got trashed with a lying propaganda campaign. If there were effective, inexpensive early treatment drugs for COVID, as there were with Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, there would have been no demand for a vaccine. And that’s why Big Pharma, American media and the Left killed those drugs and hundreds of thousands of Americans as a result. They stood to make BILLIONS on the vaccine. What were a few thousands grandmas, fathers, and uncles to them? Drag these ******** before a national criminal court and then swing them from ropes on the National Mall.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,756 Posts
Hydroxychloroquine has been used to treat coronavirus for decades but was arbitrarily deemed ineffective for use against Covid-19 and it was on the basis of no current approved treatment that "ALL" current COVID-19 Vaccines were granted EAU (Emergency Use Authorization) - This was necessary to administer them without conducting animal and human trials first to show they are safe. The FDA has yet to grant any of them official approval as being safe to use and even though manufacturers are doing everything they can to force and bribe the legalization of that goldmine right now, real experts in the field don't expect it before 2023 - otherwise its a huge gamble and there are already massive doubts based on reactions and deaths pilling up already.

If you want to take an experimental treatment thats up to you as a free American, but you should know that Hydroxychloroquine exists, has been used for decades and it's not being used right now probably because no company can patent it and make money off it since its produced all over the world for pennies.

View attachment 599699




You can also do that as a free individual but it just not recommend .
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,447 Posts
Before there was a vaccine, there was hydroxychloroquine. Plenty studies have proven it effective for treating covid, and even anti-Trumper failed-presidential candidate Senator Klobuchar had to eat her own words and admit that hydroxychloroquine saved her husband’s life.
Furthermore, no vaccine is 100% guaranteed, and if you become infected, you’ll still want every treatment available.
Fact is, hydroxychloroquine only became an “issue” because the fake news media reporters (none of who were doctors or medical professionals I might add) couldn’t finish a sentence without trying to discredit Trump about everything. How sad for the lame-stream media that they get everything wrong; spy-gate, Russia-gate, Hunter-gate, lab-gate, etc.
Plenty of studies proving hydroxychloroquine to be effect? Please do cite these studies, I would love to take a look. Especially ones where it demonstrated 100% effectiveness and safety since it seems to a big concern of yours for the vaccine.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,447 Posts
Total bullshit. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin were being used last year on early symptoms to great effect until the lying shills for Big Pharma smeared them. Just like the labs as the source of the virus turned out to be true, so now is the effectiveness of these very affordable, very effective, very safe and well established early symptoms drugs.
The people who lied about the virus’s origins and the propagandists against Hydroxychloroquine have hundreds of thousands of unnecessary US deaths on their hands and they ought to be dragged before a Nuremberg-style court to explain their complicity with the Communist Chinese Party. And then they should face the Nuremberg punishment.
Citation to studies conducted to prove "its very safety and effectiveness against covid" is required. I would like to read those clinical trials. Please cite it.

Don't be irreponsible.The lab as the source is not confirmed. It is just a possibility. The evidences that suggest it's natural origin combined with human neglect in how wet market are handled is more likely (again, not confirmed, when we are dealing with imperfect information, we are dealing in probabilities, not certainty) than lab leak based on historical precedents.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,447 Posts
That’s right. Hydroxychloroquine worked and that’s why it got trashed with a lying propaganda campaign. If there were effective, inexpensive early treatment drugs for COVID, as there were with Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, there would have been no demand for a vaccine. And that’s why Big Pharma, American media and the Left killed those drugs and hundreds of thousands of Americans as a result. They stood to make BILLIONS on the vaccine. What were a few thousands grandmas, fathers, and uncles to them? Drag these **** before a national criminal court and then swing them from ropes on the National Mall.
Again, citation of actual clinical trials and studies that demonstrated this safety and effectiveness against covid is required for your claim. Please cite it.

Then we can compare that to the safety and effectiveness of vaccine against covid.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
5,009 Posts
Vaccine is about prevention.
Fake news.

I thought you were all about credible sources and actual science, yet you continue to spread disinformation.

Tal Zaks, chief medical officer at Moderna said, “Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission, because in order to do that you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable.”
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,802 Posts
🤦‍♂️

Vaccine is about prevention.

hydroxychloroquine even if it works to some degree (and that's setting aside if it even works), it's only about treatment.

Would you prefer cancer prevention or cancer treatment?
The vaccine companies, the WHO, and the CDC in the US have all clarified the vaccine will not prevent infection. Your symptoms will be less severe than otherwise, but you are NOT immunized against covid-19.

‘this simple clarification (done quietly) is a perfect example of the lack of understanding in the community’
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,447 Posts
Fake news.

I thought you were all about credible sources and actual science, yet you continue to spread disinformation.

Tal Zaks, chief medical officer at Moderna said, “Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission, because in order to do that you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable.”
The vaccine companies, the WHO, and the CDC in the US have all clarified the vaccine will not prevent infection. Your symptoms will be less severe than otherwise, but you are NOT immunized against covid-19.

‘this simple clarification (done quietly) is a perfect example of the lack of understanding in the community’
The prevention isn't the initial infection, although evidence suggest it does do that to a degree. The main prevention is against severe covid symptoms, hospitalization, and death. And any of the vaccine do a extremely excellent job of that. In addition it greatly reduced contagiousness to others after a person is fully vaccinated.

It used authorized for off-label use, like thousands of other drugs for thousands of other ailments.
It's not authorized for covid is what you should of said. Not only is it not authorized, it's emergency use is revoked because it shows little to no effectivess and has demonstrated potential serious heart rhythm problems, blood and lymph system disorders, kidney injuries, liver problems and failure.

600039


Source: FDA revokes use of hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine for COVID-19.

So not only does it pale in comparison to vaccine if it even works, it also have much more serious potential side effects at much greater frequency. Yet you promote that over vaccine lol.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,802 Posts
The prevention isn't the initial infection, although evidence suggest it does do that to a degree. The main prevention is against severe covid symptoms, hospitalization, and death. And any of the vaccine do a extremely excellent job of that. In addition it greatly reduced contagiousness to others after a person is fully vaccinated.



It's not authorized for covid is what you should of said. Not only is it not authorized, it's emergency use is revoked because it shows little to no effectivess and has demonstrated potential serious heart rhythm problems, blood and lymph system disorders, kidney injuries, liver problems and failure.

View attachment 600039

Source: FDA revokes use of hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine for COVID-19.

So not only does it pale in comparison to vaccine if it even works, it also have much more serious potential side effects at much greater frequency. Yet you promote that over vaccine lol.
I’m fully aware of the FDA actions and a little common sense would tell you the way to reverse that decision is to prove the efficacy.
‘That proof is what we are discussing. Please keep up.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,447 Posts
I’m fully aware of the FDA actions and a little common sense would tell you the way to reverse that decision is to prove the efficacy.
‘That proof is what we are discussing. Please keep up.
Read the last sentence of the screenshot and consider the side effects. What is there to discuss?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,124 Posts
Would you prefer cancer prevention or cancer treatment?
If the method of prevention cannot prevent me from getting cancer , may actually give me cancer and I have a less than 0.5% chance of dying from said cancer , I'll take my chances and treat it IF I get cancer
 
1 - 20 of 57 Posts
Top