$1.00 a mile minimum. Nationwide. If you can't offer that, go eat a ...
Straw-man argument much? None of us living in California are clamoring for this. What we are interested in is being true contractors and not being in this grey area where we're kind of treated like employees while carrying the IC label.Great you Californians will love this. You would be making less through reduced hours, and will be told when and where to work. No more switching to the other app. As employees you'd get fired for under performing. If you hustle, there'd be no extra reward. Drivers who use rideshare as a temp job will be left out. If you really wanted to work an hourly job, probably should have not signed on to a contractor position.
You really shouldn't preach for all Californians, you immediately destroy your own argument when you do...Straw-man argument much? None of us living in California are clamoring for this. What we are interested in is being true contractors and not being in this grey area where we're kind of treated like employees while carrying the IC label.
Most also interested in seeing both companies go up in flames at this point.
What are you talking about? I'm clearly talking about those of us who reside in places like the SF forum.You really shouldn't preach for all Californians, you immediately destroy your own argument when you do...
"None of us living in California"What are you talking about? I'm clearly talking about those of us who reside in places like the SF forum.
Ok Lyft sends out an email basicaly warning "drivers should speak up if you don't want to become hourly employees"Straw-man argument much? None of us living in California are clamoring for this. What we are interested in is being true contractors and not being in this grey area where we're kind of treated like employees while carrying the IC label.
Most also interested in seeing both companies go up in flames at this point.
$2 minimum. Now THAT'S a plea I can get behind.$1.00 a mile minimum. Nationwide. If you can't offer that, go eat a [email protected]
Then wake up and *gasp* take the little hint Lyft sent in that "pathetic" email, and let California know!!!What we are interested in is being true contractors
If this is the case, that lawmakers are listening to grievances and experiences now, perhaps this is the chance to write a strong letter and send it directly to your representative.______________________
Correction - just checked and I got it at 9:18 am. They are asking for stories to forward to lawmakers and also have a link for the driver to contact their lawmaker independently. Now the campaign on the radio stations make sense. The D.J. ask for listeners to post their positive experiences with Uber and they will be read on the air.
I don't know about you but I'm interested in making more than $1...So this is going to become a job with schedule...so some will make more money, but others will be out of the job. Nice. What everyone here fails to understand is that there is finite amount of money to go around. So right now if all they got is $100, and there is 100 drivers, everyone gets a $1... and everyone complains cuz it;s not enough... what will happen is, they will only allow 10 drivers to be online, so 10 will make $10, but guess what, other 90 will make 0. So to all these who want more, I hope you will be the ones of the 90 left with 0. At least now you all got opportunity to make something, when more regulation comes, only few will make more... and yes, I know all of you think you will be those lucky 10 making more, but guess what, only 10 of you can be 10, not all 100.... so good luck to all you 90 who will make 0.
Uber will quite happily give you a script.f ....l/u both
is there any positive
Everyone is... but how do you now it will be you who will make more than $1, and not me, or the another driver you just passed today. Today everyone has equal opportunity to make money, some will make more and some will make less. If the regulations force the company to do something, they will do it, but that will come at some other cost... and that's what no one is focusing on. There is only so much money to go around, if they are forced to pay someone more that means someone else will be out of a job... and how do you know you will be at the money receiving end and not at the out of the job end?I don't know about you but I'm interested in making more than $1...
No. You said right now everyone has the equal opportunity to make 1 measly dollar. That's not making money, it's just driving for charity.Everyone is... but how do you now it will be you who will make more than $1, and not me, or the another driver you just passed today. Today everyone has equal opportunity to make money, some will make more and some will make less. If the regulations force the company to do something, they will do it, but that will come at some other cost... and that's what no one is focusing on. There is only so much money to go around, if they are forced to pay someone more that means someone else will be out of a job... and how do you know you will be at the money receiving end and not at the out of the job end?
Well if that's the case, why not just stop driving now and let others make money who feel this is worthwhile for them.... at least now you have choice to do so... once regulations come about, the choice will be made for you.No. You said right now everyone has the equal opportunity to make 1 measly dollar. That's not making money, it's just driving for charity.